PROBLEM SOLVING SUGGESTIONS
| CF |
Convert Givens to SI Units First. |
| DHW |
Done a Hard Way. |
| DOW |
Done an Old Way |
| DS |
Draw Sketch or Picture. |
| MU |
Method Unorganized. |
| LG&U |
Label the Givens and Unknowns. |
| SE&O |
Separate Equations and Operations. |
| WEF |
Write Down Equations First. |
| UMS |
Use More Steps. |
FREQUENT HOMEWORK ERRORS
| ACME |
Answer Correct, Method Erroneous.
|
| AOK |
Algebra OK to this Point. |
| AEC |
Algebraic Errors Cancel Out. |
| CC |
Confusing Two Different Concepts. |
| CE |
Confusing Two Different Events. |
| CUE |
Conversion of Units Error. |
| CQ |
Confusing Two Different Quantities. |
| DPE |
Decimal Point Error. |
| LX |
Logic Error. |
| HE |
Heat Errors. |
| EX |
Equation Incorrect. |
| ME |
Magic Equation. |
| MS |
Magic Step. |
| MOK |
Method OK, Answer Incorrect. |
| PS |
Psychic Synchronization |
| RE |
Round Off Error. |
| SCX |
Special Case Does Not Apply. |
| SF |
Significant Figure Problem. |
| SXQ |
Solved for the Wrong Quantity. |
| TX |
Trigonometric Error |
| UX |
Answer's Units are Incorrect. |
| UP |
Units Prefix Problem |
PROBLEM SOLVING SUGGESTIONS
CF - Convert Givens to SI Units First.
If you convert the values given into the correct SI units at the
start of the problem, then any subsequent answer you find - for
any variable - will automatically have correct SI units for that
variable. See UX for a table of SI units. When a problem has several
parts, this procedure saves time since you will not need to convert
the answer you find in each part to SI units separately. Moreover,
it is usually mathematical-ly easier to convert the values given,
rather than the final answers. The units of the final an-swer
are usually a more complicated mathematical expression of units
than those of the units given.
DHW - Done a Hard Way.
Your answer is correct, but the method you have used is not the
easiest way to solve this type of problem. You have overlooked
something useful. There is a simpler way that is shorter and less
complicated.
DOW - Done an Old Way.
Although the method you are using is correct, you missed a chance
to delve into the relevant physics in this section and use it
to solve this problem. You do not need to use your method to solve
this problem. Note that when I construct an exam question (to
test your understanding of the physics principle involved in this
part of the book) I always make sure that the question can not
be solved by the old method. I purposely chose a problem that
could be solved by a prior method so that you could cross correlate
the two methods if you had difficulty understanding the current
principles involved.
DS - Draw Sketch or Picture."One sketch is worth a thousand words".
Make a sketch that reflects, schematically, the process and the
data given in the problem. Making a sketch is an important or-ganizational
aide in casting the problem into a visual structure that summarizes
- at a glance - all the relevant information that you need to
solve the problem.
MU - Method Unorganized.
Your solution is too slapdash and unorganized. As the problems
get more difficult, your lack of a systematic approach will get
you into trouble even if you are able to find the correct answers
to this question. While the problems are still relatively sim-ple,
practice putting more structure into the way you write down and
solve prob-lems. The rest of the "PROBLEM SOLVING SUGGESTIONS"
contain techniques that can help you put more order into your
solutions. Also see the "Problem Solving Overhead Notes"
MU1: It is very hard to follow what you are trying to accomplish.
You need to add some more steps, label your variables more clearly,
draw a sketch of the process taking place, and explicitly write
down the equations you're are using in symbolic form.
MU2: It looks as if you are using the correct principles to solve
this problem, but I can not figure out what you are doing or how
you are trying to do it. I give up !
LG&U - Label the Givens and Unknowns.
Every quantity you handle in a problem needs a tag to distinguish
it from other quan-tities. This is especially true if there are
several quantities that are similar. A good example is the applied
force Fapp, the force of friction Ff, the centripetal force Fc, the gravitational force Fg = mg, and the net force Fnet; no two of which are the same force. The quandary is that they
are sometimes equal to each other and you can get away with not
distinguishing them separately. For example, in a frictionless
free-fall problem the Fnet and force of gravity Fg = mg are equal to each other but nonetheless they are not identical
and should have separate labels to specify which is which. As
the problems get more complex, labeling every quantity you manipulate
becomes indispensable. Memory retention experiments have shown
that the maximum number of variables an average person can keep
track of in memory is seven. My advice is to select symbols for
all quantities given or requested. Write down your symbols on
a sketch of the problem at the appropriate locations were they
occur in this problem along with the values stated; like v1= 3.20 m/s or TA = 13.5oC. For the unknowns, you might write something like "x = ?" or
just "x = " to indicate that the value of this quantity is one
of the values what you are looking for in this problem.
SE&O - Separate Equations and Operations.
In order to save time and/or steps, one sometimes combines an
equation and the operations needed to solve that equation into
a single step. Often time, what results is a mathematically incorrect
equation. For example, the following equation can not be correct,
There is no way that 360 meters can equal to 12 seconds. The intention
was to solve the equation, 360m = (30m/s)t , for the time t; which
does equal to 12s when solved. The correct steps should be
360m = (30m/s)t --> t = 360m/(30m/s) = 12s
If you practice carrying out operations on an equation that makes
the resulting equation incorrect, then eventually you will get
into trouble. You will not be able to sort out any mistakes you
may have made in writing down the equation from any mistakes you
may have made while trying to solve the equation. It is hard (if
not impossible) to discover any mistakes in an equation that is
itself mathematical-ly incorrect be-cause of some operation you
performed on the equation that might or might not have been correct
when you first wrote it down. It is okay to perform operations,
but make sure that at each step, the expression you generate is
itself mathematically correct.
WEF - Write Down Equations First.
When solving a problem it is best to write down the equation you
are using in sym-bolic form first, and then set about solving
for the unknown requested. At the begin-ning of your solution,
it is always helpful to express the principles of physics you
are using as a mathematical equation (using the symbols you have
selected to represent the given and unknowns). This technique
is useful because it shows you - at a glance - what you have assumed
are true about the question. Later you can re-read the ques-tion
again to see if what you wrote down is consistent with what is
explicitly stated in the problem. Note that if you can not get
the answer in brackets, then adding more steps is indispensable
since will help me pin point the location of any error.
UMS - Use More Steps.
If you add more intermediate steps to your solution you might
be able to detect if you are making any errors. One advantage
of using more steps is that you will be able to explicitly look
back at your prior reasoning since it is written down. All I can
deduce is that you made some error between the last term/expression/equation
you wrote down, and this term/expression/equation.
ACME - Answer Correct, Method Erroneous.
The numerical value of your answer is correct. Unfortunately,
the procedure you using to arrive at the answer is incorrect.
Getting the correct answer is not the main objective of the homework.
The primary intent is to enable you to construct/establish your
own personal, conceptual model of the underlying physics involved.
This personal understanding will allow you to solve similar problems.
The method you used will only work in the special circumstances
of this problem and will probably not work on even a closely related
problem. (The trouble is that it sometimes works and sometime
does not work.) There is much to be gained from figuring out the
error in your reason-ing, and how to revise your personal understanding
to fit this situation. In gen-eral I have found this type of error
to be most creative and unique. Some examples that I have come
across are:
ACME1: The equation d = 1/2 at2 gives the correct answer in this case, but only be-cause the
object is decelerating to rest, vf = 0. The correct equation is given by d = -1/2 at2 + vot. When vf = 0, one can show that the magnitude of the term (vot) is equal to twice the magnitude of the term (-1/2 at2) so that d = -1/2 at2 + vot = -1/2 at2 + 2(1/2 at2) = 1/2 at2, which does equal to just +1/2 at2.
ACME2: Using a = vav / t with t = d / Dv will work every time to find a, but the value for the time is always incorrect. You have confused the difference between the average speed vav and the change in speed Dv, see CQ1. The equations for both a and t are incorrect, but together they will give the correct value for a. The correct equations for a and t are t = d / vav and a = Dv / t.
ACME3: The blocks are stationary, thus acceleration is zero. It looks
like you are confusing net force with the component of weight
down the incline plane.
AOK - Algebra OK to this Point.
I can find nothing wrong with your algebra/math up the point were
I placed the "AOK", but the next step or answer is incorrect.
It is most likely that your error occurred from ether:
a. as a result of some unshown algebraic or math steps that you
used to produce your next step/answer. If you add more intermediate
steps to your solution, I may be able to located the precise points
were the error occurred.
b. incorrectly using your calculator. If it is a calculator manipulation
error, you will probably need to come by a see me to straighten
out the problem.
AEC - Algebraic Errors Cancel Out.
The numerical value of your answer is correct. However, you have
made two (or more) different algebraic errors that have by chance
canceled each other out so that you obtained the correct answer
by happenstance.
CC - Confusing Two Different Concepts.
You have mixed up one physical principle with a different principle
such as:
CC1: Constant motion with constant acceleration. The equation d = vt is only valid when the speed is constant, i.e., when a = 0. When a is constant, you can use d = v t, provided that you remember that v = vav = 1/2(vo + vf). Note that if ether vo = 0 or vf = 0, then your answer will be off by a factor of 2 if you use d = v t since the velocity you found is really vav = 1/2 vf in this case.
CC2: Conservation of energy and conservation of momentum. Mechanical
Energy, KE + PE, may not always be conserved because of heat loss,
but momentum is always conserved.
CC3: The wavelength of a matter particles l = h/mv (like an electron or proton) and the wavelength of a photon l = hc/E.
CE - Confusing Two Different Events.
You are getting the value of some variable at two different times
mixed up with each other. Try labeling the variable more carefully
so that it clearly reflects the time of occurrence such as:
| vo |
KEo |
To |
for the initial value of that quantity when t = to (normally to = 0) |
| vf |
PEf |
xf |
for the final value of that quantity when t = tf |
| v1 |
KE1 |
P1 |
for the value of that quantity associated with point 1 at time
t = t1 |
| vA |
PEA |
FA |
for the value of that quantity associated with location A at t
= tA |
| v |
KE |
P |
(with no subscript) for the value of that quantity at any time
t |
CUE - Conversion of Units Error.
Something has gone wrong in the method you are using for the conversion
of the "units given" in the question and those needed, normally
SI units. There is a list of conversion factors that may be helpful
inside the back cover of the text book.
CUE1: Everything looks mathematically correct to do the conversion
correctly but the resulting value is incorrect; it could be a
calculator manipulation error.
CUE2: The conversion factor you are using looks OK, but you have divided
by it when you should have multiplied by it (or visa versa, you
multiplied by the conversion factor when you needed to divide
by the conversion factor).
CUE3: When converting quantities that are squared {cubed} you need
to square {cube} the conversion factor.
| a. |
1m = 10-3km |
1m2 = (10-3km)2 = 10-6km2 |
1m3 = (10-3m)3 = 10-9km3 |
| b. |
1cm = 10-2m |
1cm2 = (10-2m)2 = 10-4m2 |
1cm3 = (10-2m)3 = 10-6m3 |
| c. |
|
1 liter = 1000 cm3 = 10-3m3 |
|
CQ - Confusing Two Different Quantities.
You have not clearly distinguished the difference between two
quantities that are related but are not the same. Being related
does not signify that two quantities are equivalent; they may
be intimately connected, but they can not be interchanged with
each other.
/= means not equal to
CQ1: average speed & change in speed [ vav /= Dv, i.e. , (v1 + v2)/2 /= (v2 - v1)]
CQ2: acceleration & velocity [ a /= v , a = Dv/Dt ]
CQ3: force & acceleration [ F /= a , F = ma ]
CQ4: Weight & mass [ Wt /= m , Wt = mg ]
CQ5: Force of friction & coefficient of friction µ [ Ff /= µ, Ff = µ n ]
CQ6: Net Force & applied Force [ Fapp /= ma unless Fapp is the only force]
CQ7: Kinetic Energy & velocity [ KE /= v, KE = 1/2mv2 ]
CQ8: Power & Energy, or Work & Power [ P /= DE, or W /= P, P = DE/Dt = W/Dt]
CQ9: Power & Force [ P /= Fnet, P = (FnetDd)/Dt]
CQ10: Pressure & Force [ P /= F, P = Force/Area ]
CQ11: Ptotal & DP [ DP /= Ptot, Ptot = P1+P2, DP=P2-P1]
CQ12: density & mass, or density & Volume [ r /= m, r = mass/volume ]
CQ13: Force & torque t [ F /= t, t = F l = Force x lever arm ]
CQ14: velocity & angular velocity w [ v /= w, v = w r ]
CQ15: change in angular velocity Dw & w [ Dw /= w, Dw = w2 - w1 ]
CQ16: tangential accel. aT & centripetal accel. ac [ aT /= ac, aT = r a, ac = r w2 ]
CQ17: units of charge C & capacitance C [ Q(Coul) /= C(Farad), C = Q/V ]
CQ18: Electric field E & Electric Force F [ E /= F, F = qE ]
CQ19: Electric field E & Electric potential V [ E /= V, E = DV/d ]
CQ20: degrees Celsius oC & degrees Kelvin K [ TC /= TK, TK = TC + 273.16 ]
CQ21: degrees Celsius oC & degrees Fahrenheit oF [ TC /= TF, TF = (9/5)TC + 32 ]
CQ22: change in Temp DT & absolute Temp. T [ DT /= T, DT = T2 - T1 ]
DPE - Decimal Point Error.
Your answer is basically correct except for the location of the
decimal point. Its location is off because:
DPE1: when converting a number from a power of ten notation to decimal
notation (or vise versa), you have moved the decimal point in
the wrong direction.
DPE2: the input you used has the decimal point in the wrong place.
I cannot tell how you obtained your input, but the error may be
the same as DPE1.
DPE3: of a possible calculator error when entering a power of ten numbers
into your calculator.
LX - Logic Error.
Spock (of Star Trek fame) would say:
LX1: The quantity marked can not have two different numerical values
in this problem. For example, an object can not have two different
speeds or accelerations at any one moment any more than an object
can have two different masses at the same time.
LX2: These two quantities may be related, but you can never add (or
subtract) the values of two variables that do not represent the
same type of physical quantity, i.e., that do not have the same
units. The units of every term in an equation separated by an
+, -, or = sign must have identical units. "You can not add Apples
to Joules."
LX3: Using the same symbol to represent two different quantities in
a problem can be confusing; especially when you refer back to
one of the quantities later in the problem using the same symbol.
When two quantities represent the same type of physical quantity
but are not identical, try using subscripts to indicate the difference.
Note that it is hard for me to locate your errors in this question
since I can not tell which quantity you are referring to when
you write down the symbol circled.
HE - Heat Errors.
HE1: After the ice melts its heat capacity has the same value as that
of water since it becomes water and is no longer ice. When heating
up (or cooling down) ice below freezing, you do need to use the
heat capacity of ice, 1/2 cal/g-oC, but not after it is melted and becomes water.
HE2: Not all the heat added to the "mixture" goes into just one of
the substances. Some of the heat Q goes into both substances,
Q = m1c1?T + m2c2?T.
HE3: You can use DS = (mcDT)/T to approximate the entropy change when a solid is heated up (or cooled down) provided you use the average temperature (Tf+To) /2 to approximate the temperature T. More accurately, DS = mc ln(Tf/ To) when the temperature is not constant.
EX - Equation Incorrect.
There is something wrong with the equation you are using to solve
this problem. There is a summary of the important equations at
the end of each chapter.
EX1: The equation you are using looks like the correct equation but
you have written it down incorrectly.
a. You have left off/out some term or variable.
b. You have switched two terms or variables around.
EX2: The equation you are using is not a valid physics equation. You
should be applauded for ingenuity to come up with an equation,
but be reminded that the equation you need is related to, and
derivable from, one of the fundamental equations found in the
book or discussed in lecture. Although time consuming, it is important
to always start off from the fundamental principle or law (usually
in the form of an equation) that pertains to this type of problem,
and then apply the conditions of the problem to arrive at the
specific equation you need to solve this problem.
EX3: The equation you are using is a correct equation but it does
not apply to this problem.
a. The fundamental principle that underlies the equation you are
using does not apply in this problem. "You are not in even in
the right ballpark."
b. The fundamental principle that underlies the equation you are
using is related, but your equation is not valid for the conditions
of this problem. You need to start from the fundamental equations
that underlie these types of problems and then apply the conditions
stated in the problem to derive the appropriate "equation" needed
to find the answer.
EX4: The equation you are using is not so much incorrect; it is more
the method you are using that is unsatisfactory. You have tried
to use the "ratio method" to solve this problem, and not a method
that applies the basic principles/equations of the physics we
are exploring currently. This method only works in problems were
the underlying physics equations are linear equations. Even if
this method does work, the objective of the homework problems
is to gain some understanding of physics involved and not to just
obtain the correct answer.
ME - Magic Equation.
The equation you are using does give the correct answer, but you
need to show how you arrived at this equation from the fundamental
principles and equations in this chapter. Your method shows little
understanding of the underlying physics involved. The only credit
it deserves is for ingenuity in finding an equation that will
give the correct answer.
ME1: It looks as if you just manipulated the values in "{...}" until
you found the correct equation/procedure that would give you the
correct answer. This is an inappropriate use of the "{answers}".
Note that there are no "{answers}" on the exams, so even if you
get away with using this process on the homework, this method
is not going to be of any value on the exams.
ME2: It looks as if you got this equation some place else other than
the text book or lecture. There is no way that I can see that
you could have come up with this equation without going through
some analysis to arrive at it. It is important to know how to
derive this equation from the more fundamental principles given
in the textbook or class.
MS - Magic Step.
There is no way that I can see that you could logically make this
step. This step follows from something significant that you're
missing. It is important to your personal, conceptual understanding
to discern the rationale behind this step. You need to justify
this step. I don't think you could have obtained the correct answer
without using the answers in "{...}". If you had put down the
steps that lead you to an answer, even if you know that this answer
is incorrect, I could have located the origin of your misunderstanding.
Getting the correct answer is not the ultimate goal of a homework
question; understanding how to apply the principles of physics
relevant to this question should be paramount goal if you want
to appreciate the physics that applies to this question.
MOK - Method OK, Answer Incorrect.
The method/procedure you are using looks correct, but your answer
is incorrect because the value you are using as a given (in this
part of the problem) is incorrect:
MOK1: You are using a value you calculated earlier in another part
of the problem that was wrong. Since your method is correct and
points have already been taken off for this error elsewhere, you
received full credit for this part of the problem even though
your answer is incorrect.
MOK2: You are using the values in "{...}" as input. You will not receive
full credit if you use the bracketed values even though your method
is correct.
MOK3: The starting value indicated is the wrong value for this question.
(Typically this is due to a transcription error.) Try re-reading
the problem after you have written down the "values given" to
see if they match what is stated in the question.
PS - Psychic Synchronization.
The structure of your solution is too close to that of the other
student designated. Unless you are psychically connected with
this student, there is no way I can see how both of your solutions
could be so much alike. Starting with the same principles, no
two individuals would follow the same exact steps any more than
any two people would sweep a floor identically. In this problem,
you both have made the same type of "novel error" that called
my attention to the similarities of both of your homework solutions.
In addition to this most unique error, the architecture of the
other steps you have taken to solve this homework problem are
nearly identical. Studying and working together is encouraged,
but this does not mean being in locked step. It has been my experience
that no two students do things exactly the same way, even when
they get the same answer. Exchanging ideas and information about
the principles involved in physics problems does not mean that
your own personal approach - down to last detail - will be identical
to every other student's approach. It is my judgment that somebody
is coping somebody else's work or, at the very least, giving too
much detailed assistance. Who, I do not know? Thus I am giving
you each half credit. If you want to discuss this, I will be glad
to listen to your point of view. Come by and talk. Moreover, you
are not allowed to set near each other on the next exam.
RE - Round Off Error.
You have not rounded your results off correctly. Look at both
the fourth and fifth significant figure to see if the remainder
after the third significant figure is greater than 1/2 of that
location, i.e., to see if the 4 SF is greater than 5.
RE1: You have rounded your answer twice, i.e., 104.5 = 105 /= 110
RE2: You have rounded your answer to two significant figures correctly.
However, the input is given to three significant figures. As a
result, your answer needs to also be to three significant figures.
Note that adding a trailing zero does not make your answer correct
to three significant figures.
SCX - Special Case Does Not Apply.
The equation you are using to solve this problem pertains to a
special case of this type of problem, but it does not apply to
the specific conditions of this problem. It might help if you
start with the more general form of the equations, and then transform
them to into the particular equation you need to solve this homework
problem.
SCX1: The time of fall equation, tf = sqroot(2h/g), is only valid if the object is dropped from rest when vo = 0. Here you would need to solve the equation h = -1/2at2+ votf or h = vavtf for tf.
SCX2: The equation PE = KE is only valid if the initial or final velocity
is zero. It is not valid in every conservation of energy problem.
Moreover PE = KE is ambiguous in that it seems to imply that the
PE at some moment is equal to the KE at that same moment. This
equation should really be written as PEo = KEf if the object is at rest at the start of the problem; or as PEf = KEo if the object is thrown upward from the ground and comes to a
halt at the top of its motion. Otherwise you should be using ?PE
= ?KE, or PE o + KEo = PEf+ KEf, which is always true if mechanical energy is conserved.
SCX3: This equation is only valid when there is only one force, call
it F, acting on the object. Then F is also equal to the net force
Fnet on the system; then Fnet = F. Otherwise, Fnet = F1 + F2 + F3 + ... = ma. In your solution, the applied force Fapp /= ma, since Fapp is only one of the forces acting on the object, i.e., Fapp is not the net force Fnet. Here Fnet = Fapp + Fother forces = ma.
SCX4: The torque equation t = F l is only valid if the force F is perpendicular
to l, the lever arm. Otherwise you should resolve F into two components;
one perpendicular F^ and one parallel F¤to the lever arm l. If Ø is the angle between the direction of
F and l, then the torque t = F^l = (F sinØ)l
SCX5: The work W = F d is only valid if the force F is in the same
direction as the movement of the object, d. Otherwise you need
to resolve F into two components; one perpendicular F^and one parallel Fd to the direction of motion d; and use Fd. If Ø is the angle between the direction of a force F and the
movement of the object d, then Fd = F cosØ, and W = Fd d = (F cosØ) d.
SCX6: This equation is only valid when there is no energy loss due
to friction or air resistance, i.e., when the only forces involved
are conservative force. Otherwise,
Wnet = DKE , Wgravity = DPE, Wfriction = D(KE + PE) = Egain - Eloss
SCX7: This problem involves rotational motion, and the moment of inertia equation I = Smr2 is a nonlinear equation. For this reason:
a. You can not add up the separate masses first and then plug the sum into I = mr2. The separate masses are not all at the same distance r from
the axis of rotation.
b. You can not use F = ma to find a and then convert it into a using
a = ra. You need to find a from t = Ia because the mass is not
all located the same distance r from the axis of rotation. The
mass is spread out, and the moment of inertia I takes this into
account.
SCX8: The electric charge is not all located at a single point so you
can not use the equations for a point charge to find the electric
field, electric force, or the electric potential.
SF - Significant Figure Problem.
For no good reason other than the need to agree on some standard
degree of accuracy in this class, the answers in this class are
required to be correct to three significant figures, 3 SF. This
represents an accuracy of about 1%. Unless otherwise instructed,
you need to express the answer to each question correctly to 3
SF. The givens in the problems will generally be written down
explicitly to 3 SF. If not, assume the accuracy for values given
in a question to be to 3 SF unless otherwise stated.
SF1: Your answer is correct but it needs to be expressed to only 3
SF. Your answer can not be more accurate than the accuracy of
the values given in the problem. Round off your final answer to
three significant figures.
SF2: Your answer is correct but you need to place a trailing zero
on the end of your answer to indicate that the answer is accurate
to 3 SF. For example, the answer 24 cm is only 2 SF; it should
be written as 24.0 cm to be correct to 3 SF even if the answer
is exactly just 24 with no fractional part.
SF3: Note that it does not improve the accuracy of your answer to
carry intermediate results to such a large number of significant
figures; it only waist time and effort. In most situations, you
only need to carry intermediate results to 5 SF to obtain results
correct to 3 SF. The exception being when you subtract two numbers
that are nearly equal. The best procedure is to keep all intermediately
calculated values stored in your calculator. Then the next time
you use then, they will be correct to the precision of your calculator.
SF4: The value of your third significant digit is incorrect. It does
not look as if there are enough significant digits in your intermediate
results/values to obtain a final answer correct to 3 SF. As a
rule of thumb, you need at least two more significant figures
than the accuracy you trying to obtain, i.e., your intermediate
values need to be expressed to 5 SF to obtain an answer correct
to 3 SF. For example, in expressions involving ? the value of
? needs to be express as 3.1416 and not as 3.14. Better yet, use
the '?-button' on your calculator to generated the value of ?.
For intermediately calculated numbers, the best procedure is to
keep them stored internally in your calculator. Then they will
always be as accurate the precision of your calculator. Although
this may seem to be more time consuming when you first try storing
the intermediate values, in the long run this method will be faster
and more accurate.
SF5: The value of your third significant digit is incorrect. Using
the rounded answer from one part of the question as input in other
parts of the question will generate error in your answer to this
part of the problem. The reasons are the same as those discussed
in SF4 above. Unfortunately this is not always the case; sometimes
you can get away with using rounded input and sometimes you can
not. Even using the unrounded values to 5 SF can sometimes give
an answer that is off in the last significant figure by one digit.
Note that if you store the answers (and any intermediately calculated
values) internally in your calculator, then this problem is totally
by passed.
SF6: The value of your third significant digit is incorrect. When
you subtract two numbers that are nearly equal to each other,
then you will need more significant digits than normal if the
difference is to be correct to 3 SF. If the first two digits of
the two numbers you are subtracting are equal, then you would
need to know these two numbers accurately to at least 6 SF for
their difference to be correct to 3 SF. This problem will not
occur if you have stored the two values internally in your calculator.
SXQ - Solved for the Wrong Quantity.
You have found a physical variable, but is not the unknown requested
by the problem. The quantity you found may be correct, but it
is not the answer to the question asked. I can not give you full
credit even if your answer is correct. One technique that can
help prevent this type of confusion is to reread/scan the question
over again carefully after you have finished solving for some
quantity and ask yourself "Is what I have found, what the question
asked requested ?".
TX - Trigonometric Error.
There is an error in the way you are dealing with the vector quantities
in this problem.
TX1: You are confusing the magnitude A of a vector A with one of its
components Ax or Ay. The magnitude of a vector A is related to its components Ax or Ay, but they are not the same. If Ø measures the angle that A makes
relative to the positive x-axis, then
Ax= A cos Ø, Ay = A sin Ø, A2 = A x2+ A y2, tan Ø = Ay/Ax.
If Ø is measured relative to the y-axis instead of the x-axis,
then
Ax= A sin Ø, Ay = A cos Ø, A2 = A x2+ A y2, tan Ø = Ax/Ay.
TX2: These quantities are not in the same direction; you can not simply
add or subtract their values. If the quantities are at 90 o to each other, you can use Paythagrous theorem, C2 = A2 + B2 to add or subtract their values. Otherwise, you will need to resolve
each vector into its components first, and then add or subtract
the x-components together and the y-components together separately.
See Section 2.3 in the text.
TX3: You can only use this technique when the two vectors you are
working with (be they forces or velocities, etc.) are at a right
angle 90 oto each other; which is not the case in this problem. One way
to handle this situation is to resolve each vector into its components
first, and then add the x-components together and the y-components
together separately. The resulting components are at right angles
to each other.
TX4: Under no circumstance can you add two quantities in an equation
that are at right angles to each other. They are perpendicular
and independent. The equation you have written down applies to
only one direction. Only one quantity should be in the equation;
the one that is in the same direction as that represented by the
equation. The other term applies to another equation that represent
motion at 90 o.
TX5: A triangle can not have different sides that represent different
types of physical quantities. All the sides of a triangle must
represent the same physical quantity and thus have the same units.
One side can not be velocity (or a force) while another side is
distance.
TX6: The triangle for an object's location in space (whose sides are
the distances' x and y) is not always related to the triangle
that represents the object's direction of motion (whose sides
are the components of its speed in the x and y directions). Here
tan-1 (y/x) not equal to tan-1 (vy/vx).
TX7: Trigonometric functions, sin, cos, and tan are non linear functions.
For example, suppose that y3 = y 2- y1, and that Ø= sin-1 (y /L) for all values of y and Ø, then it is not necessarily
true that Ø3 = Ø2 - Ø1. Put another way sin(Ø2 - Ø1) not equal to sinØ2 - sinØ1. Only when the angles Ø are small will this be approximately
true.
TX8: You have not made a clear seperation of the equations that apply
in the verticale y-direction and those that apply along the horizontal
x-axis. The equations are not the same, nor can they be combined.
UX - Answer's Units are Incorrect.
The units indicated are incompatible with those expected. Unless
otherwise requested, your answer's units should be one of the
following SI units:
| QUANTITY |
SI UNITS |
QUANTITY |
SI UNITS |
| Distance, Position |
m = meters |
Time, Period |
s = sec = seconds |
| Speed, Velocity |
m/s |
Acceleration |
m/s2 |
| Mass |
kg = kilogram |
Force, Weight |
N = Newton=kg-m/s2 |
| Work, Energy, Heat |
J = Joule = N-m 1 cal =4.186 J |
Power |
W = Watts = J/s |
| Momentum, Impulse |
N-s = kg-m/s2 |
|
>
|
| Density |
kg/m3 |
Pressure |
Pa = Pascal = N/m2 |
| Volume |
1 m3 = 1000 liters |
Area |
m2 |
| Angle |
rad = radians |
Angular velocity |
rad/s |
| Torque |
N-m |
Angular accel. |
rad/s2 |
| Moment of Inertia |
kg-m2 |
Ang. Momentum, |
kg-m2/s |
| Charge |
C=Coul = Coulomb |
Current |
A = Amps = C/s |
| Electric Field |
N/C = V/m |
Electric Potential |
V = Volts = J/C |
| Resistance |
Omega = Ohms = V/A |
Capacitance |
F = Farad = C/V |
| Magnetic Field |
T=Tesla= 104Gauss |
Inductance |
H = Henry = V-s/A |
| Temperature |
K = Kelvin |
Entropy |
J/K |
| Frequency |
Hz = Hertz = 1/s |
|
> |
UX1: You have not written down any units at all. An answer without
units is incomplete. For example, all the following numbers represent
the same value for acceleration: 9.80, 980, 32.2, 35.3, 35,300,
1930 when you add the units: 9.80 m/s2 = 980 cm/s2 = 32.2 ft/s2 = 35.3 km/h/s = 35,300 km/min2 = 1930 ft/min/s It may be clear to you what units you intended,
but without an explicit statement I will not give you full credit.
UX2: The numerical value of your answer is correct but your units
are not correct. They are not the units of the quantity you found.
UX3: The value and units of your answer are correct, but you must
convert this answer into the units explicitly requested or expected.
UP - Units Prefix Problem.
There is a discrepancy in your use of a prefix notation as an
abbreviation for a power of ten.
UP1: You have misconstrued the meaning of the prefix you used in your
answer. There is a table of the meaning of the prefixes on page
10 of the text. Some of the most important ones are:
| f (fermto) = 10-15 |
P (Peta) = 10+15 |
| p (pico) = 10-12 |
T (Tera) = 10+12 |
| n (nano) = 10-9 |
G (Giga) = 10+9 |
| µ (micro) = 10-6 |
M (Mega) = 10+6 |
| m (milli) = 10-3 |
k (kilo) = 10+3 |
| c (centi) = 10-2 |
d (deca) = 10 |
UP2: Your answer is correct, but you can not use both a prefix and
its equivalent power of ten at the same time. You can use one
or the other, but not both together. For example, 0.00325 seconds
could be written as 3.25 ms or as 3.25x10-3s but not as 3.25x10-3 ms. Note that 3.35x10-3 ms = 3.35x10-3 x 10-3 s = 3.35x10-6 s = 3.35 µs ? 0.00325 s.
UP3: One of the purposes of the prefix abbreviations is to be able
to express the value of a quantity without having to use the power
of ten notation. For example, a number like 3.77x10-3 s could be written simply as 3.77 ms. However to express this
number as 3.77x10-6 ks or 3.77x10+3 µ s, both of which are correct, defeat the purpose for using prefixes altogether. If you are going to use power of ten notation, then 3.77x10-3 s is a preferable choice since it is in "pure" SI unit for time.
UP4: Warning, I can not tell if you are operating under the mistaken
belief that a prefixed unit is equivalent to a "pure" SI unit.
In particular, that you do not have to change a prefixed quantity
to SI units before you substitute it into an equation, e.g., putting
in milli-something does not always mean that the resulting answer
will come out to be equal to milli-something else. Sometimes this
will work if the equation is strictly linear, directly proportional,
and you only one prefixed unit. Two examples were this will not
work are:
- If t = 3.66 ms, then d = 1/2gt2 = 1/2(9.80 m/s2)(3.66 ms)2 /= 65.3 mm even though 1/2(9.8)(3.66)2 = 65.3. Here d =1/2(9.8 m/s2)(3.66x10-3m)2 = 65.3x10-6 m = 65.3 µm.
- If t = 3.66 ms, then v = gt = (9.80 m/s2)(3.66 ms) /= 35.9 m/ms. However, this answer is equal to 35.9 mm/s buy luck. Since the equation is linear function of time and distance, the 10-3 can be transferred from the seconds to the meters .