Fire Ecology Lecture Outline

 

Part I: BASICS

 

Fire Triangle

fuels, oxygen, heat (energy/ignition source)

 

Fire Environment

            Fuels – weather - topography

 

1) Fuel: continuity, size, shape, arrangement

 

2) Fire Weather

§         Temp

§         Winds

Diurnal

Foehn: chinook, mono, north, santa ana, east

§         Fuel Moisture

§         RH

§         Atmospheric stability

                                    Clouds: cumulo-nimbus w/ anvil top

                                    Dust devils

            *Weather obs on fire crews -- importance of fire weather, dictates behavior, causes effects

            *South Canyon/Storm King -- cold front passage

 

            Fire Generated Weather

                        Fire whirls

                        Convection column, cloud

                        Wind:   up/indrafts, downdrafts (360 fire spread)

wind uprooting trees

                        Rain, signal to column collapse

 

3) Topography

                        steep slopes:     fire runs upslope, preheating

                        saddles:            funneling, winds

chutes/chimneys:           funelling, preheating

narrow canyons:           spotting

 

Fire Behavior

            Fire line intensity

            Heat/unit area

            Flame length

            Rate of spread

 

            Surface:            Flame length < 1m

            Understory:      Flame length 1 – 3m

            Crown: Flame length > 3m

 

           

Spotting

            Torching

            Crowning

 

Part II: FIRE ECOLOGY

 

Case Study

            E. Cascades

            Dry forests: PP and dry DF

 

Principals

            -equilibrial to non-equilibrial view of natural systems

                        steady progression to climax state, disturbances detrimental

                        disturbance interrupts succession, more complicated

            -communities adapted to fire

            -require fire to maintain structure and “health”

            -manage disturbances, protect all parts of system, even those you don’t know about

            -maintains/promotes biological diversity,

interrupts sucessional processes                                                                       

intermediate disturbance hypothesis

 

Disturbance Regime

            Characterized by frequency, extent, severity, seasonality

 

            Frequency

                        1-30 yrs in west

                        100’s of yrs w. cascades

                        1000’s of yrs in rainforest (drought and s. slopes)

 

Table 1:  Dry Forest Fire Return Interval for the Past Few Centuries in Oregon and Washington   

Forest Type

Oregon

 

 

Washington

 

 

 

Area in type (1,000 ha)

Fire cycle(yr)

Area burned

per yr(1000 ha)

Area in type (1,000 ha)

Fire cycle(yr)

Area burned

per yr(1000 ha)

Mixed Conifer

 

399

 

30a

 

13.3

 

504

 

50b

 

10.1

Ponderosa Pine

 

3,142

 

15c

 

209.4

 

1,438

 

15

 

95.8

 

            Extent

                        Inland NW forests, avg. 6mill acres of forest burned annually, mostly in the dry forest

                        100,000+ac fires burned regularly in late 1800s (1920 WA)

                        variability, acreage could double from one season to next

 

            Severity

                        Measure of ecological change

 

            High Severity:

                        low frequency, high intensity

                        historically rare in dry forest

                        Ex: lodgepole pine, Yellowstone NP, 30mi fire –high elevation (5000ft+)

 

            Moderate:

Varied frequency, varied intensity

            Regime least understood

            Most difficult to manage

Ex: wet DF, mixed conifer, mid-elevations in WA

 

            Low:

High frequency, intensity

Important in urban interface

Ex. ponderosa pine, dry DF

 

            Seasonality

                        Summer/early fall

                        Most lightning in Aug.

                        Foehn winds in summer/early fall

                        Varied spatially (s. vs n. watersheds)

                        Least understood

 

RESULT

            Open pk like stands

            PP dominate and seral dominant

            Isolated refugia of shade tolerant trees

            Wildflowers and grass more than brush

            High severity fire discouraged

 

Fire Suppression

            Lg fires at turn of century

1911 Weeks Act, federal $ for fire protection

protect timber resource

 

Other factors:

decrease ignitions by Native Americans

increased livestock grazing

roads and farms

 

            >>profoundly changes fire regime

 

RESULT

            Increase fuel loading

            Denser stands

            Change species composition

^ shade tolerant species (true firs), decrease in shade intolerant species

            Increase in disease: dwarf mistletoe, bark beetle, spruce bud worm

 

Altered Disturbance Regime

 

            Frequency

                        Study on Wen. NF

                        Mud Ck --       7.0 yrs, pre-1910

38.3 yrs (1910 to 1996)

 

                        Nile Ck --        6.8 to 16.2 years (Everett et al. 2000).

 

            Extent

                        Yakima R. watershed

                        1900 - 1920 over 95,000 acres burned, avg size = 248 acres

1946 - 1966  4,833 ac, avg size =  31 acres 

1967 - 1992  18,790 ac, avg size =  40 acres (Oliver et al. 1994)

 

            Severity

                        Transformation: low >> mod – high severity

                       

Dinkleman fire – Entiat RD 1988

pre-1889 fire intervals of 19, 10, 10, 20, & 13 years, but no scars were found after 1889

tree survived multiple fires but could not survive intensity of Dinkleman

 

-Ironically, denser stands shade forest floor fuels, ^ fuel moistures to the point of limiting fire spread in stands that fire formerly burned through regularly. 

-Under dry conditions these stands will now burn more intensely than they could have in their pre-1900 state

 

            Seasonality

                        No change in seasonal dist. of precip

                        Prescribed fire increases late fall and spring fires

 

                        Spring fire

                                    Inappropriate ecologically

                                    Preferred for less smoke and control

                                    Damage trees prior to stress of dry season

 

                        Fall fire

                                    Allow recovery over winter

                                   

                        Summer fire

                                    Changes in stand structure mk summer undesirable

                                    Abnormally severe fires

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part III: FIRE MANAGEMENT

 

Native Use

            Varied depending on location

            Winthrop, Spokane, Willamette Valley

           

            Purpose:           clearing brush from the forest floor

make travel easier

cultivation of edible and medicinal plants                                                            improvement of game hunting                                                     communication

 

            -evidence suggests extensive knowledge of ecological function of fire

 

Fire Use

            1940s recognition of ecological role of fire (Weaver)

            1970’s policies implemented to restore natural fire regimes

 

PNF

            “let burn” policy

            came under fire during 1988 Yellowstone Fires

            specific guidelines about weather conditions for PNF

 

Prescribed fire

1.      prepare logging units for planting

2.      reduce the risk of catastrophic fire events

3.      reintroduce fire into the ecosystem

 

normally successful

few accidents – Cerro Grande Fire, Los Alamos, NM

 

Fuels Reduction

            Thinning

 

Thin & burn

            Current debate

            Importance of fire accepted – can we achieve fire effects w/o fire?

            Thin and burn seems to be very effective, especially w/ high fuel loading

 

Fire Suppression

           

            Will remain an important part of fire management          

Urban interface

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

Agee, J.K. “The Landscape Ecology of Western Forest Fire Regimes.” Northwest Science 72, special issue (1998): 24-34.

 

Barrett, S.W., and Arno, S.F. “Indian Fires as an Ecological Influence in the Northern Rockies.” Journal of Forestry 80 (1982): 647-651.

 

Camp, A.E. “Age Structure and Species Composition Changes Resulting from Altered Disturbance Regimes on the Eastern Slopes of the Cascade Range, Washington.” Journal of Sustainable Forestry 9,3/4 (1999): 39-67.

 

Cooper, C.F. “Pattern in Ponderosa Pine Forest.” Ecology 42,3 (1961): 493-499.

 

Everett, R.L., et al. “Fire History in the Ponderosa Pine/Douglas-fir Forests on the East Slope of the Washington Cascades.” Forest Ecology and Management 129,1-3 (2000): 207-225.

 

Harrod, R.J., B.H. McRae, and W.E. Hartl. “Historical Stand Reconstruction in Ponderosa Pine Forests to Guide Silvicultural Prescriptions.” Forest Ecology and Management 114 (1999): 433-446.    

 

Hemstrom, M. A. "Vegetative Patterns, Disturbances, and Forest Health in Eastern Oregon and Washington." Northwest Science 75, special issue (2001): 91-109.

 

Hessburg, P. F., B. G. Smith, and B. Salter. "Detecting Change in Forest Spatial Patterns from Reference Conditions." Ecological Applications 9,4 (1999a): 1232-1252.

 

Mutch, R. W. "Fighting Fire with Prescribed Fire - A Return to Ecosystem Health." Journal of Forestry 92,11 (1994): 31-33.

Weaver, H. “Fire as an Ecological and Silivicultural Factor in the Ponderosa Pine Region of the Pacific Slope.” Journal of Forestry 41 (1943): 7-14.