|
THE
EFFECTS OF ELEVATED UV-B RADIATION ON PRODUCTIVITY AND BLEACHING OF ZOOXANTHELLAE
IN THE CORAL MONTASTRAEA FAVEOLATA
By Trevor Rivers, Erin Macri, and Adrienne Miller under the advisement
of Gisele Muller-Parker
Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, Bellingham,
WA 98225-9181
INTRODUCTION
Coral reef
bleaching, the phenomenon of corals losing their symbiotic zooxanthellae
and/or photosynthetic pigments, is caused by elevated temperature and UV-B
radiation. Bleaching can, for the coral, cause reduced skeletal growth,
reproductive deterioration, and if severe enough, host mortality (Glynn
1996). For the symbiont, exposure to elevated temperature and UV-B radiation
causes a depression of photosynthesis (Lesser 1996).
Objectives
-
To determine the relative effects of
elevated temperature and UV-B radiation on productivity of zooxanthellae
remaining in the coral
Montastraea faveolata, as well as those expelled.
-
To determine whether bleaching is the
result of zooxanthellar expulsion from the host or loss of photosynthetic
pigments
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Coral plugs
(2.1 cm dia.) were collected from 3 different colonies of
Montastraea
faveolata at depths of 15 ±1 m from North Perry Reef, Lee Stocking
Isl., Bahamas (Figure1 and Figure
2). Corals received either 29 °C (ambient reef temperature) or
31°C with one of the following light treatments:
| |
% Peak
Surface Irradiance*
|
|
Treatment Name
|
UVB
|
PAR
|
|
Reef
|
1.3
|
24.2
|
|
Reef+UV
|
16.9
|
30.0
|
|
Enhanced
|
54.4
|
57.8
|
*% Peak Surface Irradiance at
N. Perry Reef (16m): UVB 0.58%, PAR 24.1%
Experimental
Setup
-
Corals were placed in individual containers
in an outdoor temperature-controlled incubator for a natural photoperiod.
-
Window screen and mylar sheets were
used to obtain the desired radiation parameters for each treatment. Cellulose
acetate lids were used to prevent seawater evaporation (Figure
3).
Sampling Procedures
-
3 coral plugs from each treatment were
sampled every 24 hours for up to 120 hours.
-
Coral plugs were sampled at dusk (end
of photoperiod)
-
Expelled Zooxanthellae (EZ) for a 24-hour
period were collected from the coral containers by centrifuging all of
the seawater.
-
Concentrated cells were used to obtain
zooxanthellae cell densities and cells for use in 14C experiments.
-
Animal Zooxanthellae (AZ) were water-pikked
from the skeleton and the homogenate was processed as described in Muller-Parker
et
al. (1994) to obtain zooxanthellae cell densities and cells for use
in 14C experiments.
Productivity
-
Zooxanthellae were incubated with 14C
for 30 min. in a photosynthetron (CHPT Inc.) at predetermined irradiances
(0-1180 mmol/m2/s) and at experimental temperatures (Figure
4).
-
Pmax and alpha parameters
were obtained from photosynthetic rates using the hyperbolic tangent equation
(Jassby and Platt 1976).
RESULTS
in
situ biomass parameters
-
The zooxanthellar density remains fairly
constant over time (Figure 5).
-
The photosynthetic capacity does not
decrease over time (Figure 5).
-
The in situ zooxanthellae did
not deteriorate over the course of the experiment, indicating our data
is not affected by changes in the natural population.
Results
obtained at 29°C (ambient reef temperature)
Zooxanthellae Density
Bleaching (loss of zooxanthellae) takes
place in corals exposed to the enhanced treatment only, and only after
48 hours of exposure to this treatment. Enhanced UVB alone does not result
in coral bleaching at ambient reef temperature (Figure
6).
Productivity
-
At ambient reef temperature, photosynthesis
of zooxanthellae was unaffected by UVB radiation (Figure
7).
-
Although bleaching occurred in corals
exposed to the enhanced treatment, Pmax and a were unaffected
in the zooxanthellae remaining in the animal (AZ) in this treatment (Figure
7).
-
Pmax and a follow the same
trends in all treatments (Figure 7).
-
Expelled zooxanthellae (EZ) have lower
Pmax and a parameters than animal zooxanthellae (AZ), indicating
damage (Figure 8).
-
Productivity of EZ decreases with increasing
UVB (Figure 8).
Summary
-
Bleaching occurred only in the enhanced
treatment, after 48 hours of exposure. Only expelled zooxanthellae were
damaged, indicating that the animal protects zooxanthellae from exposure
to UVB radiation.
-
UVB radiation does not have a significant
effect on zooxanthellae at in situ reef temperatures.
Results
obtained at 31°C
Zooxanthellae Density
Bleaching takes place after 48 hours
in all treatments, suggesting that high temperature plays a larger role
in bleaching than UVB radiation (Figure
9).
Productivity
-
At 31oC, all treatments resulted
in a marked decrease in photosynthetic parameters of zooxanthellae in the
coral. The largest decrease was seen in the Enhanced treatment, followed
by the Reef+UV treatment (Figure
10).
-
Pmax and a follow the same
trend in all treatments (Figure 10).
-
Expelled zooxanthellae (EZ) have lower
Pmax and a values than animal zooxanthellae (AZ), indicating
greater damage to zooxanthellae upon expulsion from the host (Figure
11).
-
Productivity decreases with increasing
UVB (Figure 11).
Summary
-
Bleaching of corals occurred after 48
hours of exposure to 31oC, in all treatments. Zooxanthellae
remaining in the coral (AZ) and those expelled by the coral (EZ) were damaged.
These results indicate that the animal protects zooxanthellae from UVB
radiation but does not protect them at elevated temperature.
-
UVB radiation has a significant effect
on zooxanthellae at elevated temperature.
Conclusions
-
Temperature plays a larger role than
UVB radiation in coral bleaching.When combined with exposure to high temperature,
UVB radiation becomes more important, resulting in a synergistic effect
of the two stressors.
-
The animal protects the algae from UVB
radiation, but does not protect the coral from temperature stress.
-
Pmax and a follow the same
trend in all treatments. This suggests that reductions in productivity
of zooxanthellae with enhanced UVB and elevated temperature involve general
cellular damage (including damage to both the light-harvesting photosynthetic
apparatus and to enzymes involved in carbon fixation).
Implications
-
Zooxanthellae are better off in the
host during high-stress situations (high light and temperature) because
the host offers protection from UVB radiation.
-
Residual zooxanthellae in the host are
more likely to be the source of zooxanthellae for recovery after a bleaching
event, since these are less damaged by stressors than are expelled zooxanthellae.
LITERATURE CITED
Glynn, P., 1996. Coral Reef Bleaching:
Facts, Hypotheses and Implications.
Global Change Biology. 2:495-509
Jassby, A.D., and T. Platt. 1976.
Mathematical Formulation of the Relationship Between Photosynthesis and
Light for Phytoplankton.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 21:540-547.
Lesser, M.P. (1996). Elevated Temperatures
and Ultraviolet Radiation Cause Oxidative Stress and Inhibit photosynthesis
in Symbiotic Dinoflagellates.
Limnol Oceanogr. 41:271-283.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors
would like to thank: Pis Giséle Muller-Parker, Suzanne Strom, and
Jack Hardy; NSF grant C-RUI DBI 97-11075; the Shannon Point Marine Center
Staff; Scientific Technical Services, the Caribbean Marine Research Center,
Maria Bynangle, Emily Peterson, Carl Schmidt, and Teresa Steely.
| STUDENT
PROJECTS|
|
Shannon
Point
Marine
Center |