| WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY REPORT OF STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION | |||||||||||
| Winter 2002 | ANTH 424 | FORM: A -- Small Lecture JOB# 798 | |||||||||
| STEVENSON, JOAN | Number of students enrolled: 31 | ||||||||||
| MS: 9083 | Number responding: 21 Comment sheets: 17 | ||||||||||
| ITEM | DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES | ||||||||||
| E | VG | G | F | P | VP | Omit | Mean | ||||
| 1. Clarity of course goals and objectives | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 | |||
| 2. Challenge level of assigned work | 13 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.53 | |||
| 3. Fairness of evaluation procedures | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.56 | |||
| 4. Intellectual challenge offered by the course | 11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.35 | |||
| 5. Organization of the course | 5 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.05 | |||
| 6. Instructor's classroom presentation | 9 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.25 | |||
| 7. Instructor's use of classroom time | 9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.29 | |||
| 8. Instructor's answers to student's questions were: | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.52 | |||
| 9. Instructor's explanations were: | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.43 | |||
| 10. Instructor's use of examples and illustrations | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.71 | |||
| 11. Instructor's availability for extra help | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.62 | |||
| 12. Instructor's enthusiasm for the subject | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.90 | |||
| 13. Instructor's prompt response to homework/tests | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.95 | |||
| 14. Instructor's record for coming to class on time | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.90 | |||
| 15. Instructor's record for meeting with the class as scheduled | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.95 | |||
| 16. Instructor's lecture pace | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.24 | |||
| 17. Instructor's awareness of student comprehension | 8 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.19 | |||
| 18. The overall course | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.57 | |||
| 19. Instructor's effectiveness in teaching the subject matter | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.62 | |||
| 20. Instructor's contribution overall to the course | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.76 | |||
| Wanted to take course: | Course was: | Class Composition: | Grade Expected: | ||||||||
| 20 | Yes | 20 | Major req | 0 | Freshmen | 14 | A | ||||
| 0 | No | 0 | Minor req | 0 | Sophomores | 6 | B | ||||
| 1 | Neutral | 0 | GUR | 6 | Juniors | 0 | C | ||||
| 0 | Omit | 1 | Elective | 12 | Seniors | 0 | D | ||||
| 0 | Other | 2 | Graduates | 0 | F | ||||||
| 0 | Omit | 1 | Other | 0 | Pass or S | ||||||
| 0 | Omit | 0 | No Pass or U | ||||||||
| 0 | Omit | ||||||||||
| Key: | E = Excellent | 5 | Optional items supplied by instructor: | ||||||||
| VG = Very Good | 4 | 25. | |||||||||
| G = Good | 3 | 26. | |||||||||
| F = Fair | 2 | 27. | |||||||||
| P = Poor | 1 | 28. | |||||||||
| VP = Very Poor | 0 | 29. | |||||||||
| Instrument developed by the Faculty Senate. Program coordinated by the OIA T | |||||||||||