Department of Environmental Sciences
Huxley College of the Environment
Western Washington University

ESCI 439/539 Conservation of Biological Diversity

Fall 2009
Tue, Thur 9-11 am ES 410

Instructor: John McLaughlin
Office: ES 434
Phone: 650-7617
E-mail:
( Please do not send attachments in proprietary formats.)
Office Hours: Tue 11-noon, Wed 3-4, Thur 11-noon
Course Web Site: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~jmcl/Conservation/syl_2009.htm

Text: Good News for a Change: Hope for a Troubled Planet, 2002, by D. Suzuki and H. Dressel.
Recommended Text: Principles of Conservation Biology, 3rd ed., 2005, by MJ Groom, GK Meffe, and CR Carroll.
Additional readings as assigned: available online (see links below) or in course binder in Huxley resource room, ES 545.

Prerequisite: Ecology (ESCI 325 or BIOL 325), or permission of instructor.

Course Description:

This course will immerse you in the science of preserving biological diversity. It will help you to understand the causes and consequences of declines in biodiversity due to human activities, and to evaluate policies directed at preventing such declines. It will lead you through an analysis of past conservation successes and failures. It will challenge you to predict the effectiveness of future conservation programs. We will analyze conventional applications of conservation science at a single-species level, and we will evaluate programs and proposals to direct conservation efforts at levels of communities, ecosystems, and landscapes. We will discuss case studies of conservation issues in particular settings, but we also will consider topics at a conceptual level so that you will be prepared to address conservation problems in a variety of systems. Although topics will be illustrated with case studies from around the world, special emphasis will be given to the wealth of examples in the Pacific Northwest.

The course is organized as a series of lectures, discussions, and field trips.

Course Evaluation:

Grades will be based on three essays pertaining to class discussions (45%), an analysis to support conservation decisions (20%), a take-home final exam (25%), and informed participation throughout the course (10%). Essays and the conservation analysis are due at the beginning of class on the assigned date. Due to the difficulty of timely evaluation, late work cannot be accepted. Assignments, weights, and due dates are listed below.

Due

% of grade

Assignment

Oct. 13

15

Essay 1: Business without externalities

Oct. 29

15

Essay 2: Local Conservation; Democracy, Activism, Economic Policy
Essay 2 alternative: International Day of Climate Action

Nov. 17

20

Conservation decision analysis; Rubric

Nov. 24

15

Essay 3: Constraining Human Impact: the Population Imperative

Dec. 4

25

Final exam

throughout

10

Participation

 

Course Schedule

Note: Some files linked below are PowerPoint slides converted to PDF.
These are intended as aids to stimulate your memory of class discussions, not as stand-alone content.
For warnings about limits of PowerPoint as a means of communication, see the following:
Tufte, E. 2003. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT. http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint
Tufte, E. 2003. PowerPoint is evil. Wired Magazine 11.09. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html

Date

Topic

Reading

Sept. 24

What is conservation of biological diversity?

Mehrhoff et al. 2005
Mckibben 2006
Rockstrom et al. 2009
Map: bird extinctions
Map: mammal extinctions

Sept. 29

Values of biological diversity
Discussion: Relative values; Conservation as advocacy
Strong 2008
Costanza et al. 1997
Shabecoff 1993, ch. 13
Daily and Matson 2008

Oct. 1

Role of science in conservation
Discussion: How should scientists participate?
Kolbert 2009
Ehrlich 2003
Giller et al. 2008

Oct. 6

Economic drivers of biodiversity loss
Discussion: Business without externalities (ch. 1)
chapter 1 (Suzuki & Dressel 2002)
Raheem 2006

Oct. 8

Field Trip: local conservation efforts
Meet 9:15am @ Old Fairhaven Parkway x 24th St. (Veterinary Hospital)
Map to meeting location
CAO, Bellingham Planning Dept. 2009
Responsible Development

Oct. 13

Conservation planning in Bellingham and Whatcom County
Discussion: Democracy, Activism, and Economic Policy (ch. 2)
chapter 2 (S&D 2002)
Shabecoff 1993, ch.13
Lara 2007
Groves et al. 2002
Williamson 2004
Whatcom Land Trust; Map
Eissinger 2003 (selections)
Whatcom County CAO
Bellingham CAO
Stein et al. 2005

Oct. 15

The Northwest Forest Plan
NWFP documents
NSOW 2007 draft recovery plan

Oct. 15

Huxley/NSEA stream restoration party and BBQ
Restoration: 1:00-4:00 pm, 24th Street x Old Fairhaven Parkway
BBQ: 4:30-6 pm, Fairhaven Park
Attendance optional

Oct. 20

Marine conservation; fishery collapse, harvest management, MPAs
Discussion: Sustainable fishery management (ch. 7)
The End of the Line

chapter 7 (S&D 2002)
Worm et al. 2009

Oct. 22

Impacts of climate change
Discussion: Responding to climate change
Stabilization Wedges: Concept and Game

chapter 8, selections (S&D 2002)
McLaughlin et al. 2002
Montaigne 2004
Oreskes 2004
Hansen 2005
Tickwell 2006
Rosenzweig et al. 2008
IPCC 2007a
IPCC 2007b

TBD

Film: "An Inconvenient Truth"
film website: http://www.climatecrisis.net/

Oct. 24 (Sat)

International Day of Climate Action
Develop a class action, or join another!

Oct. 27

Riparian Restoration: the Redwood Creek story
Elwha River Restoration
Discussion: Water conservation and management (chapter 4)
chapter 4 (S&D 2002)

Oct. 29

Managing and restoring populations
Grizzly Bear
Gray Wolf
Discussion: Wolf conservation and management in Washington

Sustainability
Example: Decision Analysis and Transportation Planning
Gray Wolf:
Robbins 2005
Morell 2009
Morell 2008
Carroll et al. 2006
Optional: WDFW 2009

Sustainability:
Westphal & Possingham 2003
Kates 2001; Raven 2002

Oct. 31 (Sat)

Field trip: Restoration projects in Nooksack riparian zone
Meet 10:00 at ES garage doors (attendance optional)

Nov. 3

Stream restoration for salmon conservation
guest presentation: Lindsay Taylor, Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Assoc.
Managing and restoring populations (continued)
Grizzly Bear
Gray Wolf

Salmon 2100 Project
Lackey et al. 2006a
Lackey et al. 2006b
Lackey 2008

Nov. 5

Field Trip: Salmon habitat restoration
Meet at ES garage doors

Nov. 10

The population imperative
Ecological footprint, individual
Water footprint, individual
Climate impact: individual actions
Discussion: Footprints: individual, national, global

Lackey 2008
Brown 2003
Jenkins 2003
Williamson 2004

Nov. 12

The Wildlands Project
Discussion: Restoring and living with biodiversity (ch. 3)

Pennisi 1993
Trombulak 1996
Donlan et al. 2005
Noss 1992

Nov. 17

Resistance as a conservation strategy
Discussion: Resistance vs. reform

Jensen 2006 (excerpts)
Fertile Ground

Nov. 19

Conservation planning for an uncertain future, part 1
Discussion: Empowering education (ch. 9)
chapter 9 (S&D 2002)

Nov. 24

Conservation planning for an uncertain future, part 2
Discussion: Sources of hope for conservation
Mangel et al.1996

Nov. 26

Thanksgiving holiday

 

Dec. 1

Course review

 

Dec. 3

Course review

 

Dec. 4 (Fri)

Final exam due

 

Background Information

Note: Some files linked below are PowerPoint slides converted to PDF.
These files are not intended to serve as stand-alone content.
Rather, they are intended as aids to stimulate your memory of material you learned in prior courses, or to assist your reading.
For warnings about limits of PowerPoint as a means of communication, see the following:
Tufte, E. 2003. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT. http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint
Tufte, E. 2003. PowerPoint is evil. Wired Magazine 11.09. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html

 

Topic

Reading (Groom, et al. 2005)

Components, distribution, and value of biological diversity chapters 1,2,4

II. Threats to Biological Diversity

Threats to biological diversity: Review
Extinction: processes, rates, and vulnerability
Invasive species
Genetic, demographic, and population processes
Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and degradation
chapters 3,6,7,9
Sala et al. 2000
Map: bird extinctions
Map: mammal extinctions
III. Maintaining Biological Diversity

 

Multi-species conservation programs
Ecosystem management
Endangered Species Act: ESA's response to Bush Admin. changes

chapters 13, 14
Christensen et al. 1996

 

Supplementary Readings:

Bellingham Planning Dept. Fairhaven Highlands Issue site.
Updated 29 Sept. 2009. Accessed 5 Oct. 2009.

Brown, J. 2003. Paul Ehrlich, interview. Wild Earth 13(2/3)52-58.

Carroll C, Phillips MK, Lopez-Gonzalez CA, Schumaker NH. 2006. Defining recovery goals and strategies for endangered species: The wolf as a case study. BioScience 56:25-37.

Cascadia Weekly. 2008. The Gristle: Whatcom 2031. Cascadia Weekly 41(03):5-6. (8 October 2008, pp.5-6)

Christensen, N. L., et al. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665-691. Available at: http://www.esa.org/pao/esaPositions/Papers/ReportOfSBEM.php

Costanza et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387:253-260

Daily, G. C. 1999. Developing a scientific basis for managing Earth's life support systems. Conservation Ecology 3(2):14. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art14

Daily GC and PA Matson. 2008. Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci. 105(28):9455-9456.
URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/105/28/9455

Donlan J. et al. 2005. Re-wilding North America. Nature 436:913-914.

Ehrlich PR. 2003. Bioethics: Are our priorities right? BioScience 53(12):1207-1216.

Eissinger A. 2003. City of Bellingham Wildlife Habitat Assessment. City of Bellingham. (CD in course binder)
Online: http://www.cob.org/documents/pw/environment/restoration/wildlife-habitat-assessment-2003.pdf

Giller KE, et al. 2008. Ecology and Society 13(2):34. Competing claims on natural resources: What role for science?
[online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art34/

Groves CR, et al. 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. BioScience 52:499-512. (June 2002)

IPCC. 2007a. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Solomon S, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignor, and HL Miller, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York.
online: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf

IPCC. 2007b. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
online: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf

Jenkins M. 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302:1175-1177.

Jensen D. 2006. Endgame, Volume 2: Resistance. Seven Stories Press, New York.

Kates RW, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292:641-642.

Kolbert E. 2009. The catastrophist. The New Yorker 29 June 2009, pp.39-45.
Abstract: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/29/090629fa_fact_kolbert
Full text

Lackey RT, Lach DH, Duncan SL. 2006a. Wild salmon in western North America: forecasting the most likely status in 2100. pp.57-70 in: Lackey RT, Lach DH, Duncan SL, eds. Salmon 2100: The Future of Wild Pacific Salmon, Am.Fisheries Soc., Bethesda, MD.
URL: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/fw/lackey/SALMON-2100-PROJECT-FORECASTING-MOST-LIKELY-FUTURE-2008.pdf

Lackey RT, Lach DH, Duncan SL. 2006b. Policy options to reverse the decline of wild Pacific Salmon. Fisheries 31(7):344-351.
URL: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/fw/lackey/SALMON-2100-PROJECT-SUMMARY-2008.pdf

Lackey R. 2008. Delusional reality about west coast salmon. Greenversations: The official blog of the US. Environmental Protection Agency.
URL: http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/11/realityaboutsalmon/

Lara J. 2007. Compromising consent. The Planet, Fall 2007, pp.22-25.
URL: http://planet.wwu.edu/archives/2007/articles/fall/compromising-consent.html

Mangel M, et al. 1996. Principles for the conservation of wild living resources, Ecological Applications 6:338-362.

McKibben B. 2006. A deeper shade of green. National Geographic 210(2):33-41. (August 2006)

McLaughlin JF, JJ Hellmann, CL Boggs, and PR Ehrlich. 2002. Climate change hastens population extinctions.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99:6070-6074. URL: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/99/9/6070

Mehrhoff L, et al. 2005. Enhancing the impact of conservation science; The Society for Conservation Biology's Stragegic Plan 2006-2010.
http://www.conbio.org/SCB/Information/StrategicPlan/2006/SCB_StrategicPlan_Draft_Member.pdf

Montaigne F. 2004. The heat is on: EcoSigns. National Geographic 206(3):34-55.
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/0409/feature3/fulltext.html

Morell V. 2008. Wolves at the door of a more dangerous world. Science 319:890-892.

Morell V. 2009. Mixed ruling on wolf-hunting in the west. ScienceInsider, AAAS. 10 Sept. 2009.
[online]: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/09/mixed-ruling-on.html (accessed 29 October 2009)

Noss RF. 1992. The wildlands project: Land conservation strategy, Wild Earth (Special Issue):10-25.

Oreskes N. 2004. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306:1686.

Pennisi E. 1993. Conservation’s ecocentrics, Science News 144:168-170.

Raven PH. 2002. Science, sustainability, and the human prospect. Science 297:954-958.

Raheem N. 2006. An introduction to economics for conservation professionals. Soc. Cons. Biol. Newsletter 13(4):8-9.
http://www.conbio.org/Publications/Newsletter/Archives/2006-9-November/v13n4008.cfm#A13

Reading JL and TW Clark. 1996. Carnivore reintroductions: An interdisciplinary examination, pp. 296-336 in JL Gittleman, ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, vol. 2, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

Responsible Development home page. Accessed Oct. 5 2009.

Robbins J. 2005. The Look of Success. Cons.In.Practice 6(4):28-34.

Rockstrom J, et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472-475.

Rosenzweig C, et al. 2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453:353-357.

Sala OE, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774.

Scientific Societies (AFS, ESA, EntSA, SCB-NA, SRM, WS). 2006.
Scientific Societies' Statement on the Endangered Species Act. (27 February 2006)
http://www.conbio.org/Sections/NAmerica/ScientificSocietiesOnUSESA.pdf

Shabecoff P. 1993. chapter 13: "Rebuilding the house," pp.276-295, in: A Fierce Green Fire: The American Environmental Movement. Hill and Wang, New York.

Stein SM, et al. 2005. Forests on the edge: housing development on America's private forests. Gen.Tech.Rep. PNW-GTR-636. USDA-Forest Service, PNW Res.Sta., Portland OR. 16pp.
http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr636.pdf

Stringham SF. 2002. Smokey and mirrors. Wild Earth 12(3)36-41.

Strong DF. 2008. Ecologists and environmentalism. Front.Ecol.Envt. 6(7):347.

Trombulak SC. 1996. How to design an ecological reserve system, Wild Earth, Special Paper No. 1.

WDFW. 2009. Wolf Conservation and Management Plan for Washington Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). WDFW, Olympia WA. (Oct. 2009)

Wesphal MI and HP Possingham. 2003. Applying a decision-theory framework to landscape planning for biodiversity: Follow-up to Watson et al. Conservation Biology 17(1):327-329.

Williamson C. 2004. Exploring the no growth option. Planning :34-36. (Nov. 2004)

Whatcom County CAO

Worm B, et al. 2009. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325:578-585.

Return to Courses