Abnormality and the Law
-
Competency to stand trial;
-
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity NGRI
-
Civil Commitment (Involuntary commitment)
Competency to Stand Trial
-
" defendent's mental State at the time of the trial"
-
Due Process of Law: Right to:
-
cross-examine accusers
-
testify in own defense
-
Can not be tried "in absentia."
-
Understand Charges?
-
Assist in own Defense
-
Jackson vs. Indiana: treat, try, commit, or release
-
"Synthetic Competence"
Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
Wyoming Study:
-
Percentage in which NGRI is raised as a defense:
legislators lay
21% 37%
-
Percentage in which successful?
legislators lay
8% 16%
-
Actual:
-
Raised: 102/21,021 felonies
-
Success: 1/ 21,021 felonies
Competency to Stand Trial
-
" defendent's mental State at the time of the trial"
-
Due Process of Law: Right to:
-
cross-examine accusers
-
testify in own defense
-
Can not be tried "in absentia."
-
Understand Charges?
-
Assist in own Defense
-
Jackson vs. Indiania: treat, try, commit, or release
-
"Synthetic Competence"
History and Philosophy of Criminal Responsibility
-
Hebrew Law
-
Greek
-
Roman
-
English Common Law
-
"non compos mentis"
-
(no power of mind)
-
mens rea = Guilty mind/criminal intent
-
Free will is presumed
-
No free will ---> no Choice -->
-
no mens Rea --- > no crime…
-
NGRI
-
no basis for punishment
History of Insanity Plea
-
Greeks exempted as having not having free will:
-
children
-
Lunatics
-
Animals
-
Henri de Bracton (1278)
"An insane person is one who does not know what he is doing, is lacking
in mind and reason and not far removed from the beast."
-
"WILD BEAST TEST OF INSANITY
-
1954, Durham Rule: was the act a Product of mental Disease?
-
1962: American Law Institute Model Penal Code:
-
Have capacity to know what they were doing? (M'Naghten), or
-
unable to conform their behavior to the requirements of the law;
-
as a result of mental illness.
-
Guilty But Mentally Ill
-
Only Mens Rea
-
-
-
ALI Model Penal Code on Insanity and revised
A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of
such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he (is unable to)
lacks substantial capacity to either appreciate the wrongfulness of his
conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.
1984, all Federal Jurisdictions
Legal Issues Affecting Outcomes
-
Standard of Proof:
-
Preponderance of Evidence (50%)
-
Clear and Convincing Evidence (75%)
-
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (99%)
-
Burden of Proof
-
Prosecution bears the burden:
-
Defense bears the burden:
CIVIL (INVOLUNTARY) COMMITMENT
-
Imminent Danger to self or others
-
suicide
-
homocide
-
incindiary
-
deteriorating condition (gravely disabled)
-
Mentally ill
-
Offer Voluntary Committment
Commitment Procedure
-
Summons: (Complaints) (Formal)
-
Involuntary Committment Officer
-
Issues summons to appear for 72 hrs. evaluation
-
rights, charges, attorney
-
Emergency Detention (Informal)
-
Police detains person
-
MHP evaluates (12 hours)
-
ICO files petition to detain and appoint attorney... 72 hrs.
Probable Cause Hearing
-
Must be held within 72 hours
-
Rights
-
to Attorney
-
remain silent
-
cross examine
-
to refuse Meds 24 hrs. prior
-
During treatment, must have had evaluation within 24 hrs. by Licensed Mental
Health Professional
Outcome of Probable Cause hearing
-
Release or Commit for 14 days if:
-
Continues to present likelihood of harm to self, others, disabled
-
Preponderance of evidence (51%)
-
signed by physician & MHP
-
give option for voluntary
-
consider lesser restrictive
During 14 day Treatment
-
release, less restrictive, voluntary
-
If since in custody
-
threatened, attempted or inflicted harm, or
-
Substantial Danger to property
-
likelihood of harm to self or others
-
gravely disabled
-
Clear and Convincing (75%)
-
90 day commitment
After 90 day commitment
-
Hearing each 180- days
-
Rights to treatment
-
Rights to refuse treatment