LAND ORDINANCE OF 1785 (or Northwest Ordinance)

-Following the end of the Revolution the new US faced a dilemma, the Northwest Territories

-In part provided by British as attempt to destabilize the new nation

-local State disputes over ownership

-former British ally tribes in the area

 

A. Contributing factors for land ordinance and Public Land Survey System

1. Competition for control of continent

-occupy (possession is 9/10ths of the law)

2. Need to raise funds through disposal of asset

-Land main one

3. Establish title -- based on ideology -- life, liberty, & (land)

4. Want to do this cheaply, easily and quickly

B. Precedent

-All land belongs to Crown

-Title granted to individuals or Charter Companies

C. New United States

-Land belongs to people

D. Outcome

1. Policy of fixed price

-price eventually lowered to increase sales

2. Sale of land to raise money, pay-off debt

3. Creation of clear title

-extinguish native claims

-provide generally prior survey

E. Summary

  1. Rapidly Guarantee Ownership
  2. Balance budget through sale of land
  3. Encourage investment by individuals
  4. Encourage long term habitation and possession of Continent by Americans
  5. Very simple and rapid system to use

F. Criticism

1. Sale of land represents lottery -- unequal value or usefulness of land

  • lack of foresight in utilizing resource
  • no urban centers chosen
  • maximized length of transportation systems
  • no reserves (save for schools) planned into system

2. Low price of land sent signal low value

  • result waste on unprecedented scale

3. Speed and inflexibility lead to useless 160acre farms especially in high plains of Midwest

4. Made PLANNING a dirty word (no pun intended)

SPECIAL NOTE -- Did a similar process also occur in JAPAN (click and find out)