Cross Border Regions
A Methodology for understanding Cascadia???
CBR a new way of understanding and
exploring cross border management???
Cross Border Region [CBR]
New Natural Unit
the national scale as the "natural" unit for planning, policy and decision making has changed as the supra national organization and the CBR at opposite ends of the spectrum have begun to supplement and also compliment it [Leresche and Saez, 2002].
Era of Multiple Scales
"relativization of
scale" [Jessop, 2002, 25].
Economic,
political, social, and even environmental relations are no longer controlled
solely at the national scale; instead a proliferation of scales has emerged
causing governance to migrate
to the scale most appropriate to the issues.
Multiplicity of Overlapping Scales
. Rather than decisions being made based on a "topocratic" logic [a logic based on an authority
in a single defined stable territory]
Multiterritorial "adhocratic"
logic has emerged
Adhocratic logics are
based on reference territories of variable geometry, with vague and multiple
boundaries that change according to scale on which problems are treated" [Leresche and Saez ,2002, 95].
Changed Institutional Logics
Traditional affiliation logic related to
identity with the traditional political territory
Newly emerging efficiency based network or functional
logic which can emerge from and/or helps create the CBR
Result: "multilevel governance and problem solving".
new rubric the old national scale is not simply
replaced or usurped by a new scale but instead coexists with a variety of new
scales
In a similar fashion, the new functional logic augments
the affiliation logic in issues that can be "multiterritorial,
multisectoral, and multi-institutional".
Adhocratic
The problem helps define the scale(s) at which it will
be dealt,
Not simply the scale that defines and dictates the
solution to the problem as the old national topocratic
method had done.